aaron.ballman accepted this revision.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM, thank you!



================
Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:552
   (`#63503 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63503>`_)
+- Fixed parsing of elaborated type specifier inside of a new expression
+  (`#34341 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/34341>`_)
----------------



================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Parse/Parser.h:2221
+    DSC_association, // A _Generic selection expression's type association
+    DSC_new          // C++ new operator
   };
----------------
Fznamznon wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > Adding the comma so the next person doesn't have to, and realigning to the 
> > usual indentation
> Added comma, but the indentation is what clang-format gave me. I'm afraid I 
> won't pass the pre-commit with different .
Ah, we don't care if pre-commit CI fails because of clang-format due to 
following the surrounding formatting style. That said, this formatting is 
already inconsistent (I hadn't noticed the first three are at a different 
indentation level as well), so this is fine.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D153857/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D153857

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to