MaskRay added a comment. In D154357#4487896 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D154357#4487896>, @cwalther wrote:
> Thanks for the comments. Yes, `powerpc-*-eabi` should be valid (sorry if I > was unclear about that – my parenthetical was only about AArch64). There is a > PowerPC EABI: https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/PPCEABI.pdf . I > wouldn’t know if Clang/LLD obey it, but it works for us… > > I am fine with removing the vendor check if that is the consensus. Sounds good. I think `&&` is cleaner: `return Triple.getOS() == llvm::Triple::UnknownOS && ...`; Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D154357/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D154357 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
