reames added a comment.

In D151730#4491786 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151730#4491786>, @craig.topper 
wrote:

> In D151730#4491773 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151730#4491773>, @jrtc27 wrote:
>
>> Isn't multiversioning a separate thing that builds on top of per-function 
>> target attributes?
>
> That's what I thought. The supportsMultiVersioning call was in an earlier 
> version of the patch that I asked about.

Yeah, looks like I got confused.

I hadn't expected that target("default") would automatically be considered 
multi-versioning, even when there was one definition of the function.  As such, 
my test case was accidentally testing multi-versioning even when I hadn't meant 
to.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151730/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151730

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to