sammccall added a comment. In D153946#4503585 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153946#4503585>, @sammccall wrote:
> - maybe we can come up with some heuristics to improve the "no reserved > names" rule, with or without configuration. (Maybe apply it to only -isystem > headers? Linux uses angle-quoted includes, but not actually `-isystem` AFAICS) I tried this out, and it behaves well at least for linux & the C++ stdlib on my system. D155381 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D155381> if you like the approach. I have the feeling there may still be some exceptions, but we don't know about them yet and it sidesteps the config questions... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153946/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153946 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
