philnik added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:1269 /// Determine whether this class has a non-trivial copy constructor /// (C++ [class.copy]p6, C++11 [class.copy]p12) bool hasNonTrivialCopyConstructor() const { ---------------- royjacobson wrote: > shafik wrote: > > These references looks like they need to be updated. Same below and it > > looks like `hasNonTrivialCopyConstructorForCall` is missing references all > > together. > TBH I don't think those functions actually need references to the standard? > Whether the actual member functions are trivial or not is already calculated > before. Do you think I can just remove it? :) I think it makes sense to call out that these functions represent something from the standard. There are other functions with similar names, which don't have an equivalent in the C++ standard, like `hasTrivialDestructorForCall`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D154893/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D154893 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits