xazax.hun added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24349#537594, @omtcyfz wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24349#537589, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > > > If size() and empty() change object's state, it may be not equivalent > > replacement. > > > True. But my point is that they are not required to do that if they're just > not marked `const`. I agree with Eugene. But I think a good consensus could be to warn on the non-const case but do not do the rewrite. What do you think? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D24349 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
