MaskRay added a comment.

In D158137#4599461 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158137#4599461>, @dblaikie wrote:

> In D158137#4597491 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158137#4597491>, @dexonsmith 
> wrote:
>
>> In D158137#4597009 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158137#4597009>, @MaskRay 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In D158137#4596948 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158137#4596948>, @dexonsmith 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you explain the downside of leaving behind an alias?
>>>
>>> Two minor ones. (a) Existing `-Wno-overriding-t-option` will not notice 
>>> that they need to migrate and (b) Clang has accrued tiny tech debt.
>>> If we eventually remove `-Wno-overriding-t-option` for tidiness, we will 
>>> have to break `-Werror -Wno-overriding-t-option` users.
>>
>> I guess it's not clear to me we'd need to remove the alias. The usual policy 
>> (I think?) is that clang driver options don't disappear. It seems like a 
>> small piece of debt to maintain the extra alias in this case, and if it's 
>> kept, then users don't actually need to migrate. And then you can feel safe 
>> updating Darwin.cpp as well.
>
> +1 to this, FWIW - I wouldn't consider it technical debt to keep a compatible 
> warning flag name that's been around for a decade & isn't a name we're trying 
> to free up for some other use or because it causes any great confusion, etc.

I think my previous comment has answered this.
Think: every Clang release may emit some new warnings. `-Werror` users has 
actually provided a promise that they will fix reasonable toolchain changes. 
Toolchain contributors check how disruptive a change will be, but cannot 
promise that we never emit new warnings.
In this case, `overriding-t-options` seems a fairly rare and LLVM/Clang side 
has far too many other fp-model/fast-math changes to make "whether we will get 
a new warning" a fairly minor issue.
I am unfamiliar with Darwin.cpp though. If it turns out that want to disable 
the warning even with `-Wno-overriding-t-option`, we can add a workaround 
specific to Darwin.cpp, but not to fp-model/Tc.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D158137/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D158137

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to