sammccall added a comment.
I think we're not *that* far away from landing the AST change, and changing
RecursiveASTVisitor now is probably confusing and not worth the churn.
So I'd prefer to wait for now...
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp:240
+
+ bool TraverseConceptReference(const ConceptReference &C) {
+ report(C.getConceptNameLoc(), C.getFoundDecl());
----------------
after D155858 this can be VisitConceptReference
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/AnalysisTest.cpp:217
+ void $2^func2() requires $Bar4^Bar<T> {}
+ )cpp");
+ Inputs.Code = Code.code();
----------------
to complete the set I think you want
`void foo(Bar auto x)` (abbreviated template param) and `Bar auto x = 1`
(deduced type).
Though these may not pass yet
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158842/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158842
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
