cor3ntin added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp:2263
+        LocalInstantiationScope &Scope)
+    : FunctionScope(SemasRef) {
+  if (!isLambdaCallOperator(FD)) {
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> cor3ntin wrote:
> > erichkeane wrote:
> > > Wonder if `LambdaScopeForCallOperatorInstantiationRAII` should just 
> > > inherit from `FunctionScopeRAII? Am I missing why not?
> > I suppose it could yes. I think it would have to be protected so that 
> > `disable` is not misused 
> Ah, this isn't the object I thought it was (the actual scope), just the RAII, 
> so I think this is all right/not much benefit to it.
> 
> I was afraid it was the actual 'scope' object, so introspection into the list 
> of active scopes would pull us into some private variable/init somewhere 
> rather than the ctor of the containing object.  No reason to change this now.
Oups, I missed your reply and changed it. Hopefully you are still happy with it!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D159126/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D159126

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to