hazohelet wrote: > Is there some way we can narrow the scope of this patch so we don't lose > warnings for normal `snprintf`s, only for the kernel one? If we really can't > tell the difference from the source code, we could move the affected warnings > to a different warning group instead, so the kernel can turn them off.
Thanks for the feedback. I narrowed the scope by checking whether the next character of `%p` can be part of the kernel extended format specifier. If people write `%pM` or a similar outside kernel, it still aborts the format size estimator and could lead to false negative. But I think it would hurt people much less because people usually put non-alphanumeric character after `%p`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65969 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
