to268 updated this revision to Diff 556892.
to268 marked an inline comment as done.
to268 added a comment.

I have fixed the ReleaseNote formatting error.
Please land this patch on my behalf "Guillot Tony <tony.guil...@protonmail.com>"


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D159522/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D159522

Files:
  clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
  clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
  clang/test/Sema/atomic-expr.c


Index: clang/test/Sema/atomic-expr.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Sema/atomic-expr.c
+++ clang/test/Sema/atomic-expr.c
@@ -216,3 +216,9 @@
   struct T { int a; };
   (void)(_Atomic struct T)s; // expected-error {{used type 'struct T' where 
arithmetic or pointer type is required}}
 }
+
+// Test if we can handle an _Atomic qualified integer in a switch statement.
+void func_19(void) {
+  _Atomic int a = 0;
+  switch (a) { }
+}
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -6302,10 +6302,12 @@
     From = result.get();
   }
 
+  // Try converting the expression to an Lvalue first, to get rid of 
qualifiers.
+  ExprResult Converted = DefaultLvalueConversion(From);
+  QualType T = Converted.isUsable() ? Converted.get()->getType() : QualType();
   // If the expression already has a matching type, we're golden.
-  QualType T = From->getType();
   if (Converter.match(T))
-    return DefaultLvalueConversion(From);
+    return Converted;
 
   // FIXME: Check for missing '()' if T is a function type?
 
Index: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
===================================================================
--- clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@
   an invalid conversion during method function overload resolution.
 - Fix parser crash when dealing with ill-formed objective C++ header code. 
Fixes
   (`#64836 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64836>`_)
+- Clang now allows an ``_Atomic`` qualified integer in a switch statement. 
Fixes
+  (`#65557 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/65557>`_)
 
 Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Index: clang/test/Sema/atomic-expr.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Sema/atomic-expr.c
+++ clang/test/Sema/atomic-expr.c
@@ -216,3 +216,9 @@
   struct T { int a; };
   (void)(_Atomic struct T)s; // expected-error {{used type 'struct T' where arithmetic or pointer type is required}}
 }
+
+// Test if we can handle an _Atomic qualified integer in a switch statement.
+void func_19(void) {
+  _Atomic int a = 0;
+  switch (a) { }
+}
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -6302,10 +6302,12 @@
     From = result.get();
   }
 
+  // Try converting the expression to an Lvalue first, to get rid of qualifiers.
+  ExprResult Converted = DefaultLvalueConversion(From);
+  QualType T = Converted.isUsable() ? Converted.get()->getType() : QualType();
   // If the expression already has a matching type, we're golden.
-  QualType T = From->getType();
   if (Converter.match(T))
-    return DefaultLvalueConversion(From);
+    return Converted;
 
   // FIXME: Check for missing '()' if T is a function type?
 
Index: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
===================================================================
--- clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@
   an invalid conversion during method function overload resolution.
 - Fix parser crash when dealing with ill-formed objective C++ header code. Fixes
   (`#64836 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64836>`_)
+- Clang now allows an ``_Atomic`` qualified integer in a switch statement. Fixes
+  (`#65557 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/65557>`_)
 
 Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to