================
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+#include "../Basic/Targets/NVPTX.h"
----------------
jchlanda wrote:
@sam-mccall, apologies for introducing the bug and thank you for drawing my
attention to it.
I've got the fix for the problem:
```diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
index 10d1c910d9cd..3b87300e24bc 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-#include "../Basic/Targets/NVPTX.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTConsumer.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTMutationListener.h"
@@ -5612,7 +5611,8 @@ bool Sema::CheckRegparmAttr(const ParsedAttr &AL,
unsigned &numParams) {
static CudaArch getCudaArch(const TargetInfo &TI) {
if (!TI.getTriple().isNVPTX())
llvm_unreachable("getCudaArch is only valid for NVPTX triple");
- return static_cast<const targets::NVPTXTargetInfo *>(&TI)->getGPU();
+ auto &TO = TI.getTargetOpts();
+ return StringToCudaArch(TO.CPU);
}
// Checks whether an argument of launch_bounds attribute is
```
Would you be so king and point me to the process for "reverting the revert" and
folding the fix into the original patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66496
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
