steakhal wrote: > I'm confident that this patch is NFC, but my claim is based on theoretical > reasoning (a.k.a. "I think I didn't make a mistake"). I have a background in > theoretical mathematics, so for me "I have a rough a proof in my head" is > intuitively stronger than "I verified it on some arbitrary input"; but you're > right that this change is so complex that it deserves an experimental check. > I started some analysis on open source projects and I'll give results on > Monday.
Oh I see. It makes sense to me. And on second thought, it shouldn't be much of a hassle doing it anyways. I didn't mean to challenge you to be clear. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67572 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
