kuhar wrote: @vgvassilev > I find the use of the macro I proposed cleaner though.
Ideally, I think we could have an llvm-specific macro that combines the guard and the check (say `LLVM_EXPECT_DEATH`), so that it's less of a footgun. In any case, the failures should be resolved now, and we can iterate it further in the future. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66430 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
