MaskRay added a comment. In D108905#4654410 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654410>, @smeenai wrote:
> In D108905#4654403 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654403>, @ChuanqiXu > wrote: > >> In D108905#4654393 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654393>, @smeenai >> wrote: >> >>> In D108905#2975712 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#2975712>, @rsmith >>> wrote: >>> >>>> No decision as yet, but so far it looks very likely that we'll settle on >>>> the rule that exceptions cannot have potentially-throwing destructors, and >>>> that we should reject `throw`s of such types. I don't think that should be >>>> applied retroactively to C++98, though, because destructors were not >>>> implicitly non-throwing back then. >>> >>> Were there any updates here? This seems like a useful change for us, and I >>> was wondering if it could be unblocked now. >> >> What @rsmith talked about is in the standard-wise. I mean, if you feel this >> is useful, it is possible to add an compiler option to enable this. I've >> filed an issue to track this: >> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57375. My plan was to make this >> happen this year. > > Yup, an option to enable this would be great for us. I am happy to revive the patch with an option? Any suggestion to the name? CC1 or Driver? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
