jamesETsmith wrote:
@philnik777, I've added tests for `ranges::iota` to several of the
`ranges_robust_against_*` tests where I thought it was appropriate. Below is a
breakdown (mostly for my own tracking) of what I've done and what I'm still
sorting through (`ranges_robust_against_proxy_iterators`). If you see anything
that I missed or got wrong, just let me know.
- libcxx/test/std/algorithms
- [X]
libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_result_alias_declarations.compile.pass.cpp
- [X] libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_dangling.pass.cpp
- [ ]
libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_differing_projections.pass.cpp
- I don't think we need this one, since we don't use projections
- [ ]
libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_nonbool_predicates.pass.cpp
- I don't think we need this one since we don't use predicates
- [ ]
libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_omitting_invoke.pass.cpp
- I don't think we need this one because we don't use invoke
- [ ]
libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_proxy_iterators.pass.cpp
- This one is giving me trouble bc because 'Proxy<int &>' does not satisfy
'weakly_incrementable'
- libcxx/test/libcxx/
- [ ]
libcxx/test/libcxx/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_copying_comparators.pass.cpp
- I don't think we need this since we don't use comparators
- [ ]
libcxx/test/libcxx/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_copying_projections.pass.cpp
- I don't think we need this since we don't use projections
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68494
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
