Hi Richard, Thanks for your analysis.
This patch is intended to mitigate use-after-free bugs. In that context a “define strict behavior for invalid pointer values” we could deploy in production code would be very useful. Maybe calling this a sanitizer is misleading, and instead it could be presented as “change implementation defined behavior to be less convenient but more security friendly." Matt _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
