Endilll wrote:

> If you see failures locally, it's best to understand where they coming from: 
> even if it passes on bots it just means we have a hole in our test coverage.

Sure, but it wasn't the first time I've seen local test failures that doesn't 
reproduce anywhere else (`Clang :: LibClang/symbols.test`). By the time I 
merged this PR, me and Aaron have spent hours staring at the changes without 
any progress. So we wanted an additional confirmation that this is not in the 
same as `Clang :: LibClang/symbols.test` failure, especially looking at 
pre-commit CI that reported just a several seemingly unrelated clang-tidy 
failures. I hope it is acceptable that we decided not to spend even more time 
before trying this PR out on wider range of buildbots.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71322
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to