schenker wrote: > I'm not sure now if this wont cause too much false-positives, after all this > is why CheckFunctionCalls option were added. Sometimes object can have 2 same > operators, one const and one not, in such case depend on "this" type, > non-const could be used, this would be false-positive.
You are right, I misunderstood `CheckFunctionCalls` and it's trickier than I thought. Anyways, I think it would make sense to treat method calls and method operator calls the same way. I will rething my imlementation, thanks for reviewing! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71974 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
