HighCommander4 wrote: > I see; it's a bit unfortunate that such an "invented" call expression gets an > ordinary `SourceLocation`.
Out of curiosity, I dialled into today's LLVM [office hours](https://llvm.org/docs/GettingInvolved.html#office-hours) and asked Aaron Ballman about this. He also did not see an obvious way to tell apart the invented `CallExpr`s from regular `CallExpr`s, but suggested that it could be reasonable to just change the code for building the invented `CallExpr`s to give them an invalid SourceLocation (and then our inlay hints code should filter them out without further changes). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71366 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
