dongjianqiang2 wrote: > > @MaskRay the reason for adding this option is that gcc supports it. please > > refer to [godbolt.org/z/54sE6zTa1](https://godbolt.org/z/54sE6zTa1) > > This doesn't answer my question. GCC has a lot of options that Clang doesn't > support. An option supported by GCC does not mean that Clang needs to support > it. This option has perfect replacement, which makes it even questionable > (since to the best of my knowledge `-export-dynamic` driver option is not > used) See my previous comment: > > > GCC's default spec file for Linux does not say how -export-dynamic > > translates to ld -export-dynamic. > > I think ld --export-dynamic is exclusively caused by -Wl,--export-dynamic > > or -rdynamic. > > Do you have any example of gcc -export-dynamic uses?
This is historically undocumented option. and yes, it can be repalced by -rdynamic. See [PR47390](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390). The purpose of this pull request is to ensure consistency between the two compilers. If you think it's unnecessary to support it, I'm fine with it. : ) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72781 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
