Author: marshall
Date: Mon Oct 10 16:00:12 2016
New Revision: 283799
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=283799&view=rev
Log:
Update with the rest of the results from the 7-Oct Telecom
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=283799&r1=283798&r2=283799&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Oct 10 16:00:12 2016
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2221";>2221</a></td><td>No
formatted output operator for nullptr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch
ready</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2223";>2223</a></td><td>shrink_to_fit effect on
iterator validity</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2261";>2261</a></td><td>Are
containers required to use their 'pointer' type
internally?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2358";>2358</a></td><td>Apparently-bogus definition of
is_empty type trait</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2394";>2394</a></td><td>locale::name specification
unclear - what is implementation-defined?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to
do.</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2460";>2460</a></td><td>LWG issue
2408 and value categories</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2468";>2468</a></td><td>Self-move-assignment of
library types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -114,7 +113,7 @@
<tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2742";>2742</a></td><td>Inconsistent string interface
taking string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2744";>2744</a></td><td>any's
in_place constructors</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2745";>2745</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] Implementability
of LWG 2451</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2747";>2747</a></td><td>Possibly
redundant std::move in [alg.foreach]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2747";>2747</a></td><td>Possibly
redundant std::move in [alg.foreach]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch
ready</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2748";>2748</a></td><td>swappable
traits for optionals</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2749";>2749</a></td><td>swappable
traits for variants</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2750";>2750</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] LWG 2451
conversion constructor constraint</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -123,12 +122,17 @@
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2754";>2754</a></td><td>The
in_place constructors and emplace functions added by P0032R3 don't require
CopyConstructible</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2755";>2755</a></td><td>ยง[string.view.io] uses
non-existent basic_string_view::to_string function</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We
already do this</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2756";>2756</a></td><td>C++ WP
optional<T> should 'forward' T's implicit
conversions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2758";>2758</a></td><td>std::string{}.assign("ABCDE",
0, 1) is ambiguous</td><td>We already do this</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2759";>2759</a></td><td>gcd / lcm
and bool for the WP</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2760";>2760</a></td><td>non-const
basic_string::data should not invalidate
iterators</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2765";>2765</a></td><td>Did LWG
1123 go too far?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2767";>2767</a></td><td>not_fn
call_wrapper can form invalid types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2768";>2768</a></td><td>any_cast
and move semantics</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769";>2769</a></td><td>Redundant
const in the return type of any_cast(const
any&)</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+<!-- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769";>2769</a></td><td>Redundant
const in the return type of any_cast(const
any&)</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> -->
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2771";>2771</a></td><td>Broken
Effects of some basic_string::compare functions in terms of
basic_string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2773";>2773</a></td><td>Making
std::ignore constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2777";>2777</a></td><td>basic_string_view::copy should
use char_traits::copy</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2778";>2778</a></td><td>basic_string_view is missing
constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
</table>
<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
@@ -138,7 +142,6 @@
<li>2221 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2223 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
<li>2261 - <b>Survey our containers to make sure we do this.</b> Ideally, this
will result in no code changes.</li>
-<li>2358 - We already do this; I improved the tests</li>
<li>2394 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
<li>2460 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
<li>2468 - <i>I think we already do this; but will need to survey the libray
to be sure</i></li>
@@ -188,7 +191,7 @@
<li>2742 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2744 - <i>std::any</i></li>
<li>2745 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
-<li>2747 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the
existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
+<li>2747 - Patch ready, but I can't think of any way to test it.</li>
<li>2748 - <i>std::optional</i></li>
<li>2749 - <i>std::variant</i></li>
<li>2750 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
@@ -197,12 +200,17 @@
<li>2754 - </li>
<li>2755 - Both string and string_view call a common routine for output; so no
code changes needed.</li>
<li>2756 - <i>std::optional</i></li>
+<li>2758 - We already do this. </li>
<li>2759 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2760 - This is just wording cleanup; no code or test changes needed.</li>
<li>2765 - is this just wording cleanup????? I don't think this actually
requires code changes. </li>
<li>2767 - </li>
<li>2768 - <i>std::any</i></li>
-<li>2769 - <i>std::any</i></li>
+<!-- <li>2769 - <i>std::any</i></li> -->
+<li>2771 - We already do this.</li>
+<li>2773 - </li>
+<li>2777 - This should be easy; existing tests should suffice</li>
+<li>2778 - This is mostly tests.</li>
</ul>
<p>Last Updated: 10-Oct-2016</p>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
