================ @@ -92,14 +94,14 @@ namespace ImplicitCapture { [] { return ref_i; }; // expected-error {{variable 'ref_i' cannot be implicitly captured in a lambda with no capture-default specified}} expected-note {{lambda expression begins here}} expected-note 2 {{capture 'ref_i' by}} expected-note 2 {{default capture by}} static int j; - int &ref_j = j; - [] { return ref_j; }; // ok + int &ref_j = j; // cxx03-fixme-note {{declared here}} + [] { return ref_j; }; // cxx03-fixme-error {{variable 'ref_j' cannot be implicitly captured in a lambda with no capture-default specified}} cxx03-fixme-note 4 {{capture}} cxx03-fixme-note {{lambda expression begins here}} ---------------- philnik777 wrote:
I don't really understand this failure. It would be great if someone could point me at the logic for allowing the capture of `ref_j`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73376 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits