hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h:3005
+/// \endcode
+AST_MATCHER(VarDecl, isStaticDataMember) {
+ return Node.isStaticDataMember();
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> How does this differ from the existing matcher `hasStaticStorageDuration()`
> over a `fieldDecl()`?
`fieldDecl` document says that fieldDecl is "an instance of this class is
created by Sema::ActOnField to
represent a member of a struct/union/class.". So for static class members, they
should not belong to `fieldDecl` as they are not bound to class instances.
Technically, we can't apply `hasStaticStorageDuration()` and
`isStaticStorageClass` over a `fieldDecl`.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25600
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
