HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> Thanks for doing this. Does it mean we would have to add every type we use to
> our config? It would be much more convenient if clang-format treated the
> argument list the same way that it treats in definitions. For example
>
> ```shell
> printf "int\niso_time(time_t) { return 1; }\n" | clang-format -style='{
> AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType: All }'
> ```
>
> gives
>
> ```c
> int
> iso_time(time_t) {
> return 1;
> }
> ```
>
> whereas
>
> ```shell
> printf "int\niso_time(time_t);\n" | clang-format -style='{
> AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType: All }'
> ```
>
> will need a config edit to work.
>
`clang-format` doesn't know what are types, except for the keywords. So there
is no way to decide if this is a function declaration without naming the
parameters, or a variable declaration with a constructor call.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76206
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
