Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà ?= <polmarcetsa...@gmail.com>,
Pol Marcet =?utf-8?q?Sardà ?= <polmarcetsa...@gmail.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76...@github.com>
================
@@ -10895,6 +10899,132 @@ bool VectorExprEvaluator::VisitUnaryOperator(const
UnaryOperator *E) {
return Success(APValue(ResultElements.data(), ResultElements.size()), E);
}
+static bool EvaluateVectorOrLValue(APValue &Result, EvalInfo &Info,
----------------
Destroyerrrocket wrote:
> is the name inaccurate, or is this using 'false' to mean 'failure' AND 'not a
> vector'?
Indeed, false is being treated as a failure and not a vector.
> It seems to me that this needs to be something like "EvaluateLValueVector" or
> something?
I'm not entirely sure if the way I implemented the handling of an lvalue as a
parameter is even the correct way to go with, so it might very well be that the
reason it sticks out is because I'm doing something wrong. I guess I'll have to
wait for someone who has dealt with lvalues in constexpr to tell me where I
went wrong
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76615
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
