jhuber6 wrote:

> Makes sense to me, though this is not my area of expertise. Could you add a 
> bit more elaborate test? Perhaps something that would check the linker 
> invocation>?

I'm not familiar with how Fortran handles stuff here. It's tested in the 
`clang` portion at least. The handling of this is in `CommonArgs` somewhere I 
believe. If Fortran shares that it should be inherited, so it's at least tested 
in the `clang` version so it might be fine.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77135
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to