[clang] [clang-format] Don't confuse initializer equal signs in for loops (PR #77712)

[Gedare Bloom via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -703,7 +703,9 @@ void ContinuationIndenter::addTokenOnCurrentLine(LineState 
&State, bool DryRun,
 
   if (Current.is(tok::equal) &&
       (State.Line->First->is(tok::kw_for) || Current.NestingLevel == 0) &&
-      CurrentState.VariablePos == 0) {
+      CurrentState.VariablePos == 0 &&
+      (!Previous.Previous ||
+       Previous.Previous->isNot(TT_DesignatedInitializerPeriod))) {
----------------
gedare wrote:

not a for loop, but similar code should be possible in a for loop initialization

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77712
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits