MaskRay wrote:

> What's the expected interaction here with LTO? Modifying TargetOptions has no 
> effect if we're generating a bitcode file.

Thanks for reminding me this. There seems no motivation to mix trad/desc, so I 
think we can do it the `-ffunction-sections`/`-femulated-tls` way by passing an 
option to the linker...

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79256
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to