barcharcraz wrote: > I think @rnk has the deepest knowledge here. > > Just to double check, when you say "Eliminate the static asan runtime", you > mean the use case it was supporting will still keep working, but in a > different way right?
Yes. The static asan runtime didn't work very well in the first place, so this actually improves support for those use-cases. The static runtime is still supported on non-windows systems, however. The whole static linked asan runtime library is gone on windows, but you can still use the dynamic asan runtime with a statically linked CRT. The core reasoning is that asan is a "only one allowed per process" type thing (you can't have one copy of the asan runtime handling a malloc while a different one handles the corresponding free). To get this on windows you really need to use a DLL or some really, really horrible hacks that essentially amounted to doing yourself what the loader already does for DLLs. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
