On 8 November 2016 at 16:59, Alexander Kornienko <ale...@google.com> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2016 2:11 AM, "Malcolm Parsons" <malcolm.pars...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Oh, I was using clang-analyzer-alpha.cplusplus.VirtualCall. >> >> Should clang-tidy have an option to enable experimental checks? > > I'd instead ask Static Analyzer folks if they can graduate this check. What > is your experience with it? Do you feel it's good enough for mainstream?
It found lots of places where delegating constructors, final classes or final virtual methods would be useful. I agreed with its analysis. -- Malcolm Parsons _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
