arsenm wrote: > In this case, MMRAs would only help in the sense that you won't need any new > attributes and can just add an MMRA such as `atomic-lowering:fine-grained`. > It's not really what MMRAs were made for (because this attribute doesn't > affect semantics, just lowering style I think?),
It is semantics. You get undefined behavior if you access fine grained memory for an atomic where the instruction doesn't handle it. I don't think it quite fits into the MMRA box, since it isn't about the synchronization properties of the memory access but where the underlying memory is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69229 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
