Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <brio...@google.com>,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <brio...@google.com>,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <brio...@google.com>,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <brio...@google.com>,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <brio...@google.com>,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <brio...@google.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80...@github.com>


================
@@ -1295,11 +1295,13 @@ double4 trunc(double4);
 /// true, across all active lanes in the current wave.
 _HLSL_AVAILABILITY(shadermodel, 6.0)
 _HLSL_BUILTIN_ALIAS(__builtin_hlsl_wave_active_count_bits)
+__attribute__((convergent))
----------------
llvm-beanz wrote:

I'm not sure I entirely agree with @arsenm here.

>From the LLVM-IR and compiler implementation perspective it is helpful to be 
>able to expect that convergent is the default expected behavior, but from the 
>language perspective for HLSL it is preferable to imply that convergence is 
>the outlier because in the common case convergence isn't required.

I really don't want to tie the implementation of HLSL to a 4.5 year old PR that 
isn't merged.

@bogner, do you have thoughts here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80680
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to