================
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fdiagnostics-parseable-fixits -Wformat %s
2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-pedantic %s
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
We're missing a comparison between `-Wformat` and `-Wformat-pedantic` in terms
of handling scoped enumerations. We should have a pair of RUN lines to show
that this diagnostic is in pedantic only.
One thing that helps with testing this is to use something like
`-verify=expected,pedantic` and `// pedantic-warning {{msg}}`:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html#verifying-diagnostics
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88595
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
