================
@@ -27,3 +26,20 @@ namespace rdar10544564 {
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr1)() = &Y::memfunc1;
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr2)() = &Y::memfunc2;
}
+
+namespace test2 {
+ struct A {
+ int val;
+ void func() {}
+ };
+
+ void test() {
+ decltype(&(A::val)) ptr1; // expected-error {{invalid use of non-static
data member 'val'}}
+ int A::* ptr2 = &(A::val); // expected-error {{invalid use of non-static
data member 'val'}}
+
+ // FIXME: Error messages in these cases are less than clear, we can do
+ // better.
+ int size = sizeof(&(A::func)); // expected-error {{call to non-static
member function without an object argument}}
+ void (A::* ptr3)() = &(A::func); // expected-error {{call to non-static
member function without an object argument}}
----------------
zwuis wrote:
> I would expect `err_invalid_non_static_member_use` to be used there too (or
> rather, that case should be consistent with above)
This inconsistency is irrelevant to PR 40906. I am confused about the following
questions:
1. Do I need to remove these tests?
2. Do I need to fix this inconsistency in this PR, or a new PR?
3. Should I open an issue for it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
