OCHyams wrote: > Comment in the code should probably mention this as a FIXME and include a > reference to the issue?
Sure, added in f78949a07e33017a798c410a102c95455685a9b1 > Also, there's another bug here - the DW_TAG_typedef is in the CU scope, > instead of the struct scope. But if the struct is a non-template, the typedef > is in the struct scope as it should be, not the CU scope... That does looks odd - I can reproduce it with normal (language-level) typedefs too (rather than with template aliases): https://godbolt.org/z/GsGKqhKzz. I can open a separate issue? Now that I think about it, I recall @CarlosAlbertoEnciso running into something similar a while ago... I'm sure a bug was filed about something similar but I can't find it. Does this ring any bells @CarlosAlbertoEnciso? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90032 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
