================
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ let IntrProperties = [IntrNoMem, IntrSpeculatable,
IntrWillReturn] in {
// The result of eh.typeid.for depends on the enclosing function, but inside a
// given function it is 'const' and may be CSE'd etc.
-def int_eh_typeid_for : Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_ptr_ty], [IntrNoMem]>;
+def int_eh_typeid_for : Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_anyptr_ty],
[IntrNoMem]>;
def int_eh_return_i32 : Intrinsic<[], [llvm_i32_ty, llvm_ptr_ty]>;
----------------
AlexVlx wrote:
Possibly, but it's a slightly different matter which I should probably deal
with in another PR, wherein we handle the fact that the Program AS needn't be
0. AFAICT these intrinsics are here to support GCC's `__builtin_eh_return`, and
the pointer arg is supposed to point to a handler function in the Program AS. I
think it's preferable to handle that topic independently since it'll spawn its
own lively discussion, no doubt.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88182
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
