SimplyDanny wrote: > If nothing is provided, then nothing can be detected.
And why is this not a valid test? No `CHECK-*` comments in the reference file, so no violations from `clang-tidy` are expected? > `not` will treat non-zero return code as success. It is totally different > thing. 👍 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
