steakhal wrote: > The "cert" package looks not useful and the checker has not a meaningful name > with the old naming scheme. > Additionally tests and documentation is updated. > The checker looks good enough to be moved into non-alpha package.
Personally, I prefer reviewing content changes separately from deciding/moving the checker out of alpha. Here are the reasons for doing so: - When content is moved around, a different set of mistakes can be made than when updating some doc content. - These are orthogonal decisions. --- I'd suggest to split this PR into two: - Keep this PR for updating the content. - Have a separate PR for moving it out of alpha. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92424 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
