================
@@ -1459,11 +1460,11 @@ static AccessResult CheckEffectiveAccess(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("invalid access result");
}
-static Sema::AccessResult CheckAccess(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
- AccessTarget &Entity) {
+static SemaAccess::AccessResult CheckAccess(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
i find myself wondering if this should just take `SemaAccess` instead of
`sema`, with all the below churn. It seems to make more sense, even if it has
to do an extraction of Sema in the function.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92674
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
