owenca wrote: > Since I am by no means an expert on Clang, a few questions arose > > * As Clang formats the code correctly (no code changes necessary) when > instead of `xor` a different function name e.g. `xooor` is used, I wonder why > `xor` is tokenized as Unary operator in the first place in C? > * Is C and C++ using the same tokenizations?
clang-format formats all C code as C++. Since `xor` is a C++ keyword, it's lexed as `tok::caret`, which is then erroneously annotated as `TT_UnaryOperator`. This bug was uncovered by #90161. > * How to properly distinguish between the C and C++ language in Clang Format? clang-format can't do it properly. @mydeveloperday, @HazardyKnusperkeks, and @rymiel may know more about why we didn't add `LK_C` to the [`Language`](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#language) option. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92741 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
