Sirraide wrote:

> > This closes #92439.
> 
> It does not (`s++++` is still not diagnosed)

Oh, right; this was mainly in reference to the libstdc++ bug since that’s 
what’s most of the discussion on that issue has been about. I’d maybe suggest 
moving the `s++++` case to a different issue?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93059
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to