ajwock wrote: The problem that this solves is related to binary size. In situations where a large C API is in generated code but a small part of the API is used, the size of __llvm_prf_names and __llvm_cov_fun sections can be prohibitively large. This flag offers a way to reduce binary size in this case assuming you aren't concerned with coverage of non-emitted code.
Would this flag make more sense if it were named differently? For example, `-fcoverage-mapping-only-emitted-code`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92582 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits