cor3ntin wrote:
I think I prefer the current wording, it's clearer that it's not conforming (at
the very least we should say something like "clang extension". and maybe
"referring to main is a clang extension".
LGTM otherwise
do we have test that this is fine?
```
namespace foo {
int main();
using a = decltype(&main);
}```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96168
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
