[PATCH] D27794: Make some diagnostic tests C++11 clean

[Paul Robinson via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

probinson added a reviewer: rnk.
probinson updated this revision to Diff 81977.
probinson added a comment.

Remove the OpenMP tests from this review (committed in r290128).

+rnk who added test/Parser/backtrack-off-by-one.cpp originally.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D27794

Files:
  test/FixIt/fixit.cpp
  test/Parser/backtrack-off-by-one.cpp
  test/SemaCXX/copy-assignment.cpp


Index: test/SemaCXX/copy-assignment.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaCXX/copy-assignment.cpp
+++ test/SemaCXX/copy-assignment.cpp
@@ -1,12 +1,22 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s 
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++11
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+// expected-note@+3 2 {{candidate constructor}}
+// expected-note@+2 {{passing argument to parameter here}}
+#endif
 struct A {
 };
 
 struct ConvertibleToA {
   operator A();
 };
 
 struct ConvertibleToConstA {
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+// expected-note@+2 {{candidate function}}
+#endif
   operator const A();
 };
 
@@ -69,6 +79,9 @@
   na = a;
   na = constA;
   na = convertibleToA;
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+// expected-error@+2 {{no viable conversion}}
+#endif
   na = convertibleToConstA;
   na += a; // expected-error{{no viable overloaded '+='}}
 
Index: test/Parser/backtrack-off-by-one.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Parser/backtrack-off-by-one.cpp
+++ test/Parser/backtrack-off-by-one.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s -std=c++98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s -std=c++11
 
 // PR25946
 // We had an off-by-one error in an assertion when annotating A<int> below.  Our
@@ -10,8 +12,10 @@
 
 // expected-error@+1 {{expected '{' after base class list}}
 template <typename T> class B : T // not ',' or '{'
-// expected-error@+3 {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}
-// expected-error@+2 {{expected ';' after top level declarator}}
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
+// expected-error@+4 {{expected ';' after top level declarator}}
+#endif
+// expected-error@+2 {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}
 // expected-error@+1 {{expected ';' after class}}
 A<int> {
 };
Index: test/FixIt/fixit.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/FixIt/fixit.cpp
+++ test/FixIt/fixit.cpp
@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-comment -verify -fcxx-exceptions -x c++ %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-comment -verify -fcxx-exceptions -x c++ -std=c++98 %s
+// RUN: cp %s %t-98
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-comment -fcxx-exceptions -fixit -x c++ -std=c++98 %t-98
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -Wall -Werror -Wno-comment -fcxx-exceptions -x c++ -std=c++98 %t-98
 // RUN: not %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fdiagnostics-parseable-fixits -x c++ -std=c++11 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-// RUN: cp %s %t
-// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-comment -fcxx-exceptions -fixit -x c++ %t
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -Wall -Werror -Wno-comment -fcxx-exceptions -x c++ %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-comment -verify -fcxx-exceptions -x c++ -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: cp %s %t-11
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-comment -fcxx-exceptions -fixit -x c++ -std=c++11 %t-11
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -Wall -Werror -Wno-comment -fcxx-exceptions -x c++ -std=c++11 %t-11
 
 /* This is a test of the various code modification hints that are
    provided as part of warning or extension diagnostics. All of the
@@ -21,7 +25,10 @@
 
 template<int Value> struct CT { template<typename> struct Inner; }; // expected-note{{previous use is here}}
 
+// In C++11 this gets 'expected unqualified-id' which fixit can't fix.
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
 CT<10 >> 2> ct; // expected-warning{{require parentheses}}
+#endif
 
 class C3 {
 public:
@@ -41,7 +48,11 @@
 };
 
 class B : public A {
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+  A::foo; // expected-error{{ISO C++11 does not allow access declarations}}
+#else
   A::foo; // expected-warning{{access declarations are deprecated}}
+#endif
 };
 
 void f() throw(); // expected-note{{previous}}
@@ -285,8 +296,10 @@
     void (*p)() = &t<int>;
     (void)(&t<int>==p); // expected-error {{use '> ='}}
     (void)(&t<int>>=p); // expected-error {{use '> >'}}
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
     (void)(&t<S<int>>>=p); // expected-error {{use '> >'}}
     (Shr)&t<S<int>>>>=p; // expected-error {{use '> >'}}
+#endif
 
     // FIXME: We correct this to '&t<int> > >= p;' not '&t<int> >>= p;'
     //(Shr)&t<int>>>=p;

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits