efriedma-quic wrote: I mean, this is conceptually fine as far as it goes, but I'm not sure where we actually want to use it. As noted on the other PRs, llvm.used/llvm.global_ctors/llvm.global_dtors don't really want a flat address-space. The "address-space" for llvm.used, and for the "associated global" for global_ctors/global_dtors, is not a real address-space; it's just there because the IR representation forces the use of some address-space.
For most places using address-space "0", there's some appropriate address-space, it's just nobody has spent any time thinking about what that address-space is, and everything defaulted to "0" when address-spaces were introduced into LLVM. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95728 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
