arsenm wrote: > You could theoretically break this if you didn't go through the C ABI and > ignored type promotion, but I'm not concerned with that kind of misuse since > it's against the ABI in the first place.
The IR has its own ABI that may or may not match whatever the platform "C ABI' is. Especially given the lack of a formal platform ABI specification, I would not characterize not using the C ABI as misuse or against the ABI https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96369 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
