AaronBallman wrote: > Oh that makes sense so > > ``` > static void f(); > void *k = _Generic(&f, void (*)(void) : 0, default : f); > ``` > > should be ok since it is not in the result expression?
Correct, that's a good test case to add! Similarly, it would be good to add one like: ``` void *k = _Generic(&f, int (*)(void) : 0, default : f); ``` to show that it is diagnosed because it's used in the result expression. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98016 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
