================
@@ -6848,6 +6848,14 @@ CXXRecordMembersNamed(StringRef Name, Sema &S, QualType 
Ty) {
   return Results;
 }
 
+QualType Sema::getTypeMember(QualType Type, StringRef Name) {
+  auto Results = CXXRecordMembersNamed<TypeDecl>(Name, *this, Type);
+  assert(Results.size() <= 1);
+  if (Results.empty())
+    return {};
+  return Context.getTypeDeclType(*Results.begin());
+}
----------------
zygoloid wrote:

This is bypassing access and ambiguity diagnostics, which doesn't seem correct 
given that a `common_type` specialization could have a private `type` member.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99473
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to