timshen added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27872#639020, @hfinkel wrote:
> it is not at all obvious what is going on (i.e. why are we casting to > integers?). Maybe semPPCDoubleDoubleImpl needs a better name now? It seems > confusing to have semPPCDoubleDoubleImpl and semPPCDoubleDouble where one is > not really an "implementation" class of the other. This is true. I renamed it to semPPCDoubleDoubleLegacy, and modified its documentation. I didn't put the documentation for each of the uses, because that'd be too verbose. https://reviews.llvm.org/D27872 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
